Your week goes in. Posts that sound like you come out. You approve every one.

1 · Connect once

Liftli lives inside the AI you already use — Claude today (a paid Claude plan is what you need), with ChatGPT and Cursor next. There's no dashboard to learn and nothing to install on LinkedIn.

Setup takes about two minutes: the Start free flow walks you through connecting Liftli to Claude and pulling in a sample of your writing so it can extract your voice. From then on, you talk to your AI the way you already do — Liftli is just there, holding your strategy and memory.

The free tier is a one-time lifetime allowance, no card: 3 posts, 10 comments, 3 idea extractions, and voice extraction. Enough to see whether the drafts actually sound like you before you pay anything. Plans are on the pricing section.

2 · It gathers

Most tools start you at a blank topic box. Liftli starts at your actual week. It pulls raw material from:

• Voice notes — talk into your phone via Telegram; a 90-second ramble on the drive home is a post seed.
• Call transcripts — the sharp thing you said in Tuesday's client call, captured instead of lost.
• GitHub activity — what you actually shipped, not what you vaguely remember shipping.
• Chats — the explanation you typed to a colleague that deserved a bigger audience.
• The news in your lane — so you can react while a story is still a story.

This is why Liftli drafts don't read like everyone else's: the input is your life, not a shared inspiration library. Detectably-AI posts underperform human writing in most professional niches (Originality.AI's 2025 study of 3,368 posts) — the fix isn't better templates, it's better raw material.

3 · It drafts

Every draft is written in your extracted voice — patterns learned from your own writing, kept persistently per person — and matched to your strategy: your positioning, your audience, your calendar, what's worked before.

And no draft goes straight from idea to your screen. Each one runs a full plan → draft → critique → revise loop first: Liftli plans the angle, writes it, critiques its own work against your voice and strategy, and revises — before you ever see it. What lands in front of you is the version that survived that process, not a first attempt.

The same engine drafts comments for posts worth engaging with, so your presence isn't just publishing — it's participating.

4 · You say yes

This is the step other autopilot tools skip, and it's the point of the whole design. Liftli's pipeline runs on autopilot right up to a one-tap approval gate. For each draft you do exactly one of three things: approve, tweak, or skip. Nothing publishes without you. Ever.

Why insist on the gate?

• Feeds punish unsupervised AI. Detectably-AI content underperforms human writing in most professional niches. A human decision on every post is what keeps your content on the right side of that line.
• Your name is the asset. One post you'd never have said, published under your name, costs more than a hundred good ones earn. The gate means that can't happen.

The gate is also cheap: reading a draft and tapping yes takes seconds. You keep the judgment; Liftli keeps the labor.

5 · It learns

After you post, Liftli closes the loop. It logs outcomes, scores engagement on what you published, and surfaces warm leads — the people whose engagement patterns suggest they're worth a conversation, not just a like (lead analysis up to 100 leads on Pro).

Then it recalibrates: next week's plan reflects what this week's posts actually did. Which angles landed, which formats fell flat, who showed up. Your skips and tweaks feed the same memory — the drafts drift toward you, not away. That persistent strategy-plus-memory is the difference between a writing tool and a strategist.

One founder data point on where this can lead: a Liftli-drafted LinkedIn comment became a cited source in AI search results — discovered by accident by Liftli's founder, Oded Tsamir. LinkedIn is the #1 cited source for professional questions in AI search, per Profound's 2026 citation reports. More on that on LinkedIn and AI citations.

6 · Publishing

Today, publishing is deliberately simple: Liftli hands you the approved text and you post it yourself — copy, paste, publish, on LinkedIn, X, or Substack. Your accounts stay untouched.

Native publishing and scheduling work one way only: through the platforms' official APIs, connected only when you explicitly link an account. Never through browser extensions, scraping, or bots acting on your account — the category LinkedIn's User Agreement prohibits and has enforced against (extension tools restricted, and Kleo, with 70K users, shut down mid-2025). If that risk is why you're shopping, the Taplio alternative page goes deeper.

If you already run a scheduler you like, keep it — Liftli is the strategist layer, and it pairs fine with an execution layer like Typefully (see Typefully vs. Liftli).

When this loop is not for you

Honesty over conversion. If you want a hands-off tool that posts for you while you look away, Liftli will frustrate you — the approval gate is non-negotiable, by design. If you don't use an AI assistant day to day, or don't have a paid Claude plan yet, you'll be adopting two things at once. And if what you really want is a standalone scheduling dashboard with queues and team seats, a dedicated execution app is the better buy — check current details on each vendor's site.

Liftli is for people whose week is already full of good material and whose bottleneck is turning it into a consistent, in-their-own-voice presence — founders, consultants, builders. That's the loop above, run every week.